Table of contents

- Home
- Introduction
---- first name, origin of the name
---- law of january 8th, 1993
---- around the first name
-Chapters
----- the moment of the choice
----- the choice of the pregnancy and of the genre
----- our friends animals
----- the death and the firstname
----- sick firstnames
----- american firstnames
----- creation
----- incestuous choice
----- mythological first names
----- regional first names
----- parrot first name
----- mr and mrs have a son
----- breaking up first names
----- the centre of the saint
----- hysteria and firstnames
----- son of...
----- danger out names
----- first names, in order of...
----- individuation and first name
----- first names of stars
----- turn around the world
----- first names like a burden
----- nickname, obliteration of oneself
----- diminutive
----- small name
----- until where they will stop
----- what one does not name
----- phantasm and first name

- Conclusion




The Traumatism of the first name
This site was carried out according to the book of François Bonifaix, with the Dune95 Editions

 
God and the first name

With the wire of the pages, this need to name, prénommer, were done growing unceasingly. Of our "haspric" with Jean, we named, named, we represented all that we named, except... and like a ring of Moebius, the paradox brings back for us to the religion.

In the religions monotheist, God should not be represented. When Moïse brings back the Tables of the Law, it asks its people to cease the idolatrery, to give up golden calf and the divinities for a single God with whom one will not set up statues. The texts insist on this point there until formal prohibition. What pushes a religion has not to have not the right to represent its creator? God, in the religion, made the man with his image, but it is thepowerful one. If the man represented it, it would have human image, image left entendement human. It would lose in fact of its divine dimension. It is because it is represented only it perdure.

Let's see all the other beliefs, Greek, Roman, they were supplanted by what one cannot represent, thus keeping all its "mysterious" aspect and beyond being it of flesh. The only link which it was allowed to establish, the intermediary, was its "sons", of the god and the woman. God is very thing says us one and especially what is not representable, God is infinite and in all the characteristics which are brought to him this term returns to each stating, God is infinitely good, God is infinitely love... Nothing which can return the entendement human one to an unspecified representation.

With at the time in Buddhism, Bouddha is represented, but he is not a god. But Buddhism is not a religion, it is a philosophy where all the things and the beings are represented either such as they are or métaphoriquement.